With regards to dimension of close envy, regarding the forty mind-report devices was stated because the creation of brand new Mind-Report and Projective Jealousy Bills (Bringle, Roach, Andler, & Evenbeck, 1979). Of many tools were used only when. , 1992) intended to evaluate gender distinctions; the latest Multidimensional Envy Size (Pfeiffer & Wong, 1989) built to evaluate the about three size of jealousy (intellectual, psychological and you will behavioral proportions); the brand new Twitter Jealousy Scale (Muise, Christofides, & Des) geared towards comparing the possibilities of a conference that triggers ideas out of envy members regarding the craft on the Myspace; brand new Envy Scale (Buunk, 1997), familiar with evaluate three kind of envy (activated, anxious and you will precautionary) and also the Interpersonal Jealousy Size (IJS; Mathes, & Severa 1981), and that evaluates the new bad feeling due to genuine otherwise threatened losses off a loved individual an opponent.
In Brazil, the fresh new Close Jealousy Directory is changed (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) For Colombia, there are not any psychometric education out-of a particular scale on the close envy
Regarding the Latin-american framework, there is an adaptation when you look at the Chile of List out-of Behaviors of Pair That cause Envy (Fernandez, Pavez, & Dufey, 2014). Inside the Mexico, an effective Multidimensional Way of measuring Jealousy (Diaz-Loving, Rivera, & Flores, 1989) could have been elaborated and you can an initial data is carried out with the fresh new Multidimensional Inventory out-of Intimate Jealousy (Mota, Gonzalez-Arratia, Valdez, Gonzalez, & Hernandez, 2016). In addition, early in the day training did not would Factorial Confirmatory Data (CFA) to validate the fresh new grounds framework found, and you can reasonable accuracy profile was utilized in the items (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) otherwise small examples were used (Mota ainsi que al., 2016).
The newest IJS developed to possess Mathes and you can Severa (1981) the most put balances to have contrasting romantic jealousy, they located six points that gauge the awareness so you can risks relevant to: (a) Lover’s infidelity and you can relationship anyone else (facts step 1, 3, a dozen, fourteen, 15, sixteen, 20, twenty-two, 23, and you may twenty five); (b) Partner’s prominence (products 2, step three, cuatro, 7, 10, thirteen, 17, 20, and you may 23); (c) An enthusiastic untrustworthy lover (facts step 1, 4, 6, 19, and you will 21); (d) Partner’s old dates (products eleven, twenty-four, twenty-six, 27, and you can twenty eight); (e) Lover’s apathy (circumstances 8, nine and you will twenty-four); and you can (f) Lover’s left family which have old schedules and you may sex differences (situations 5 and you may 18).
Most of the devices in the list above show adequate quantities of validity and precision
You’ll find five degree with checked with regards to the reliability and you may validity. Mathes and you may Severa (1981) introduce several knowledge, while the basic data did the construction of size with 39 issues, which was smaller in order to 28 facts immediately after analytical data. Then, for the the second investigation, IJS was utilized alongside other balances one to examined romantic love-hyperlinks, low self-esteem, self-esteem and a random questionnaire of independent identities, verifying, predicated on idea, that advanced out-of envy, the greater the amount of Romantic love and cheaper brand new separate identity of one’s pair. In https://datingmentor.org/tr/blackfling-inceleme/ this study, we statement good coefficient off reliability from .ninety-five for the full level. For the a third studies, Mathes, Phillips, Skowran and you will Penis (1982), to expand brand new signs off validity, utilized the IJS and two behavioral measures: (a) danger whenever confronted by a rival and (b) terms regarding possessiveness for the partner, by way of a mobile call which they designed to the one who took part in the study. The latest expected correlations was basically gotten, hence once more served new authenticity of your measure. Ultimately, inside a fourth analysis, Mathes, Roter and you may Joerger (1982) substantiated new convergent authenticity away from IJS along with other bills that examined romantic jealousy.